+208.6%
FROG vs SAN
+358.9%
-150.4%
-49.6%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 3y.
| Period | Portfolio | SAN | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | -3.3% | -0.8% | -2.5% | -3.1% |
| 7D | -11.3% | +1.8% | -13.1% | -11.7% |
| 30D | +3.6% | +2.0% | +1.7% | +3.1% |
| 3M | +1.7% | +19.7% | -18.1% | -3.2% |
| 6M | +123.5% | +30.6% | +92.9% | +106.5% |
| YTD | +40.2% | +28.8% | +11.4% | +28.3% |
| 1Y | +81.0% | +57.8% | +23.2% | +52.6% |
| All | +208.6% | +358.9% | -150.4% | +65.8% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside SAN.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus SAN return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × SAN return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 3y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded SAN wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
3y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling