+188.1%
FROG vs PLTD
-77.8%
+265.9%
-49.6%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for all.
| Period | Portfolio | PLTD | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | -3.3% | +4.6% | -8.0% | -1.8% |
| 7D | -11.3% | +5.9% | -17.2% | -9.3% |
| 30D | +3.6% | -11.6% | +15.2% | +0.8% |
| 3M | +1.7% | -29.9% | +31.6% | -5.2% |
| 6M | +123.5% | -28.5% | +152.1% | +113.9% |
| YTD | +40.2% | -20.4% | +60.6% | +39.5% |
| 1Y | +81.0% | -33.3% | +114.3% | +74.7% |
| All | +188.1% | -77.8% | +265.9% | +124.6% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside PLTD.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus PLTD return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × PLTD return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over all: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded PLTD wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
all analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling