+208.6%
FROG vs PFGC
+65.1%
+143.4%
-49.6%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 3y.
| Period | Portfolio | PFGC | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | -3.3% | -0.5% | -2.8% | -3.2% |
| 7D | -11.3% | -2.2% | -9.1% | -10.8% |
| 30D | +3.6% | -11.9% | +15.6% | +7.1% |
| 3M | +1.7% | +5.0% | -3.3% | -1.1% |
| 6M | +123.5% | +8.6% | +114.9% | +113.5% |
| YTD | +40.2% | +9.7% | +30.6% | +31.5% |
| 1Y | +81.0% | -6.3% | +87.3% | +82.9% |
| All | +208.6% | +65.1% | +143.4% | +113.1% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside PFGC.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus PFGC return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × PFGC return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 3y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded PFGC wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
3y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling