-82.4%
FRMI vs PLTU
-42.2%
-40.2%
-85.8%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for all.
| Period | Portfolio | PLTU | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | +11.5% | -4.7% | +16.2% | +12.2% |
| 7D | +23.3% | -11.6% | +34.9% | +25.0% |
| 30D | -7.6% | -4.6% | -3.0% | -8.2% |
| 3M | +0.2% | +33.7% | -33.5% | -9.7% |
| 6M | -28.7% | -9.4% | -19.3% | -31.1% |
| YTD | -28.6% | -34.7% | +6.1% | -28.8% |
| All | -82.4% | -42.2% | -40.2% | -81.3% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside PLTU.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus PLTU return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × PLTU return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over all: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded PLTU wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
all analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling