-84.3%
FRMI vs LDOS
-28.2%
-56.1%
-85.8%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for all.
| Period | Portfolio | LDOS | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | +5.3% | +0.5% | +4.8% | +5.4% |
| 7D | +2.4% | -5.4% | +7.8% | +1.5% |
| 30D | -17.3% | +4.9% | -22.2% | -16.8% |
| 3M | -17.2% | +7.2% | -24.3% | -13.9% |
| 6M | -43.4% | -24.2% | -19.1% | -40.2% |
| YTD | -36.0% | -25.8% | -10.2% | -31.1% |
| All | -84.3% | -28.2% | -56.1% | -83.5% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside LDOS.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus LDOS return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × LDOS return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over all: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded LDOS wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
all analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling