-82.4%
FRMI vs HTZ
-67.5%
-14.9%
-85.8%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 3y.
| Period | Portfolio | HTZ | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | +11.5% | -5.0% | +16.5% | +12.2% |
| 7D | +23.3% | -2.5% | +25.8% | +23.6% |
| 30D | -7.6% | -3.7% | -3.9% | -6.8% |
| 3M | +0.2% | -57.0% | +57.2% | +4.8% |
| 6M | -28.7% | -47.0% | +18.3% | -27.1% |
| YTD | -28.6% | -57.5% | +28.9% | -25.9% |
| All | -82.4% | -67.5% | -14.9% | -79.2% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside HTZ.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus HTZ return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × HTZ return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 3y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded HTZ wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
3y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling