-95.2%
FRMI vs EPAM
+6.5%
-101.7%
-95.3%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 3y.
| Period | Portfolio | EPAM | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | +2.6% | -3.9% | +6.5% | +1.3% |
| 7D | -39.8% | +13.4% | -53.2% | -36.0% |
| 30D | -60.5% | +47.1% | -107.5% | -54.5% |
| 3M | -74.6% | +71.2% | -145.8% | -69.2% |
| 6M | -71.8% | +48.9% | -120.7% | -65.5% |
| YTD | -80.4% | -22.2% | -58.1% | -79.0% |
| 1Y | -93.9% | -5.2% | -88.7% | -92.2% |
| All | -95.2% | +6.5% | -101.7% | -93.0% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside EPAM.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus EPAM return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × EPAM return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 3y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded EPAM wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
3y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling