-55.5%
FND vs PLTU
+154.0%
-209.6%
-61.5%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for all.
| Period | Portfolio | PLTU | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | +1.7% | -9.0% | +10.7% | +2.3% |
| 7D | -5.2% | -13.6% | +8.4% | -4.5% |
| 30D | -19.9% | +16.7% | -36.5% | -20.9% |
| 3M | +2.7% | +29.6% | -26.8% | -0.3% |
| 6M | -21.7% | -0.1% | -21.6% | -23.5% |
| YTD | -17.5% | -31.5% | +14.0% | -18.1% |
| 1Y | -39.3% | -19.7% | -19.6% | -41.2% |
| All | -55.5% | +154.0% | -209.6% | -63.8% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside PLTU.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus PLTU return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × PLTU return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over all: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded PLTU wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
all analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling