-10.5%
FND vs ALHC
-55.2%
+44.7%
-43.3%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 1y.
| Period | Portfolio | ALHC | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | +4.1% | -1.0% | +5.0% | +4.2% |
| 7D | +8.5% | +3.9% | +4.7% | +8.3% |
| 30D | +17.2% | -3.6% | +20.9% | +17.7% |
| 3M | -14.9% | -49.4% | +34.5% | -10.7% |
| 6M | +3.1% | -59.5% | +62.5% | +7.4% |
| YTD | -12.4% | -63.2% | +50.8% | -13.7% |
| All | -10.5% | -55.2% | +44.7% | -22.1% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside ALHC.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus ALHC return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × ALHC return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 1y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded ALHC wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
1y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling