-51.8%
FN vs UMAC
-13.6%
-38.2%
-60.8%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 6mo.
| Period | Portfolio | UMAC | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | +11.7% | +10.8% | +0.9% | +9.2% |
| 7D | 0.0% | -23.4% | +23.3% | +5.6% |
| 30D | -34.3% | -45.6% | +11.3% | -26.2% |
| 3M | -39.9% | -50.9% | +11.0% | -32.8% |
| 6M | -51.8% | -16.5% | -35.3% | -49.3% |
| All | -51.8% | -13.6% | -38.2% | -49.3% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside UMAC.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus UMAC return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × UMAC return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 6mo: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded UMAC wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
6mo analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling