+160.3%
FN vs RGEN
-3.7%
+164.1%
-47.1%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 3y.
| Period | Portfolio | RGEN | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | +3.1% | -1.2% | +4.3% | +3.4% |
| 7D | -1.7% | -4.9% | +3.2% | -0.6% |
| 30D | -22.0% | +5.7% | -27.7% | -23.0% |
| 3M | -43.0% | +32.4% | -75.4% | -47.0% |
| 6M | -27.7% | +33.2% | -60.9% | -33.5% |
| YTD | -10.5% | +2.3% | -12.8% | -11.6% |
| 1Y | +12.5% | +39.0% | -26.5% | +2.3% |
| All | +160.3% | -3.7% | +164.1% | +162.2% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside RGEN.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus RGEN return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × RGEN return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 3y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded RGEN wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
3y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling