-55.6%
FN vs LSCC
-19.6%
-36.1%
-60.8%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 6mo.
| Period | Portfolio | LSCC | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | -14.2% | -8.6% | -5.6% | -7.1% |
| 7D | -16.0% | -4.8% | -11.2% | -12.1% |
| 30D | -40.1% | -27.1% | -13.0% | -23.0% |
| 3M | -43.9% | -23.6% | -20.3% | -29.7% |
| 6M | -55.6% | -19.8% | -35.8% | -41.5% |
| All | -55.6% | -19.6% | -36.1% | -41.5% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside LSCC.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus LSCC return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × LSCC return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 6mo: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded LSCC wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
6mo analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling