+81.3%
FN vs IAG
+573.1%
-491.8%
-60.8%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 3y.
| Period | Portfolio | IAG | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | -14.2% | +0.2% | -14.4% | -14.3% |
| 7D | -16.0% | +4.5% | -20.5% | -16.9% |
| 30D | -40.1% | -5.7% | -34.4% | -39.5% |
| 3M | -43.9% | +10.1% | -54.0% | -45.1% |
| 6M | -55.6% | +7.3% | -62.9% | -56.5% |
| YTD | -35.7% | +6.1% | -41.8% | -37.5% |
| 1Y | -39.8% | +46.8% | -86.6% | -44.3% |
| All | +81.3% | +573.1% | -491.8% | +37.1% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside IAG.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus IAG return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × IAG return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 3y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded IAG wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
3y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling