+160.3%
FN vs ENPH
-71.4%
+231.8%
-47.1%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 3y.
| Period | Portfolio | ENPH | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | +3.1% | +0.2% | +3.0% | +3.1% |
| 7D | -1.7% | -2.4% | +0.7% | -1.2% |
| 30D | -22.0% | -6.6% | -15.4% | -21.0% |
| 3M | -43.0% | -46.8% | +3.8% | -36.3% |
| 6M | -27.7% | -14.7% | -13.0% | -25.3% |
| YTD | -10.5% | +13.5% | -24.0% | -12.6% |
| 1Y | +12.5% | -0.4% | +12.9% | +11.5% |
| All | +160.3% | -71.4% | +231.8% | +205.6% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside ENPH.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus ENPH return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × ENPH return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 3y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded ENPH wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
3y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling