-99.7%
FLZH vs VOO
+77.4%
-177.2%
-99.9%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 3y.
| Period | Portfolio | VOO | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | -1.2% | +0.8% | -2.0% | -2.6% |
| 7D | +2.4% | -0.8% | +3.2% | +3.7% |
| 30D | -93.6% | -1.1% | -92.6% | -93.4% |
| 3M | -97.2% | +3.9% | -101.1% | -97.3% |
| 6M | -97.0% | +13.6% | -110.7% | -97.5% |
| YTD | -98.8% | +12.7% | -111.5% | -99.0% |
| 1Y | -99.5% | +17.6% | -117.0% | -99.6% |
| 3Y | -99.7% | +77.3% | -177.1% | -99.8% |
| All | -99.7% | +77.4% | -177.2% | -99.8% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside VOO.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus VOO return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × VOO return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 3y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded VOO wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
3y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling