-63.9%
FLUT vs PLTU
+154.0%
-217.9%
-70.1%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for all.
| Period | Portfolio | PLTU | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | -2.2% | -9.0% | +6.8% | -1.4% |
| 7D | -1.6% | -13.6% | +11.9% | -0.5% |
| 30D | +7.7% | +16.7% | -8.9% | +5.5% |
| 3M | -0.7% | +29.6% | -30.3% | -5.5% |
| 6M | -11.2% | -0.1% | -11.1% | -14.3% |
| YTD | -53.4% | -31.5% | -21.9% | -53.8% |
| 1Y | -65.8% | -19.7% | -46.0% | -67.1% |
| All | -63.9% | +154.0% | -217.9% | -71.3% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside PLTU.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus PLTU return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × PLTU return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over all: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded PLTU wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
all analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling