-43.1%
FLUT vs LCID
-92.2%
+49.1%
-70.1%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 3y.
| Period | Portfolio | LCID | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | -2.2% | +1.7% | -3.9% | -2.4% |
| 7D | -1.6% | -6.6% | +4.9% | -0.9% |
| 30D | +7.7% | -30.1% | +37.9% | +12.0% |
| 3M | -0.7% | -17.6% | +16.9% | 0.0% |
| 6M | -11.2% | -54.4% | +43.3% | -4.9% |
| YTD | -53.4% | -55.7% | +2.3% | -50.2% |
| 1Y | -65.8% | -71.0% | +5.3% | -61.8% |
| All | -43.1% | -92.2% | +49.1% | -28.6% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside LCID.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus LCID return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × LCID return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 3y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded LCID wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
3y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling