-50.9%
FLUT vs BTSG
+389.4%
-440.4%
-70.1%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 10y.
| Period | Portfolio | BTSG | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | +1.9% | +1.5% | +0.4% | +1.8% |
| 7D | +0.4% | -3.3% | +3.7% | +0.7% |
| 30D | +2.5% | -1.6% | +4.1% | +2.6% |
| 3M | -9.2% | -6.9% | -2.3% | -9.5% |
| 6M | -8.2% | +42.1% | -50.3% | -14.7% |
| YTD | -53.2% | +56.8% | -110.1% | -57.3% |
| 1Y | -65.6% | +109.8% | -175.4% | -69.9% |
| All | -50.9% | +389.4% | -440.4% | -60.1% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside BTSG.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus BTSG return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × BTSG return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 10y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded BTSG wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
10y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling