-43.1%
FLUT vs ARES
+51.9%
-95.0%
-70.1%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 3y.
| Period | Portfolio | ARES | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | -2.2% | -1.0% | -1.2% | -1.8% |
| 7D | -1.6% | -1.7% | 0.0% | -1.0% |
| 30D | +7.7% | +0.3% | +7.5% | +7.5% |
| 3M | -0.7% | +8.5% | -9.2% | -4.5% |
| 6M | -11.2% | +23.5% | -34.6% | -20.0% |
| YTD | -53.4% | -11.2% | -42.2% | -51.7% |
| 1Y | -65.8% | -19.3% | -46.5% | -63.2% |
| All | -43.1% | +51.9% | -95.0% | -50.8% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside ARES.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus ARES return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × ARES return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 3y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded ARES wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
3y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling