-52.0%
FLUT vs ACM
-12.3%
-39.6%
-75.9%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 3y.
| Period | Portfolio | ACM | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | -1.5% | 0.0% | -1.6% | -1.5% |
| 7D | -1.1% | +5.4% | -6.4% | -3.3% |
| 30D | +7.7% | +15.1% | -7.4% | +1.6% |
| 3M | -12.2% | -10.5% | -1.7% | -9.0% |
| 6M | -17.6% | -19.7% | +2.1% | -11.1% |
| YTD | -62.0% | -28.8% | -33.2% | -56.9% |
| 1Y | -62.3% | -47.9% | -14.4% | -50.7% |
| 3Y | -52.0% | -12.4% | -39.6% | -57.0% |
| All | -52.0% | -12.3% | -39.6% | -57.0% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside ACM.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus ACM return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × ACM return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 3y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded ACM wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
3y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling