-72.3%
FLNC vs XPO
+258.4%
-330.7%
-90.4%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for all.
| Period | Portfolio | XPO | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | -4.2% | -1.0% | -3.2% | -3.7% |
| 7D | -5.0% | -1.3% | -3.7% | -4.3% |
| 30D | -26.1% | -10.4% | -15.7% | -21.6% |
| 3M | -55.2% | -15.7% | -39.5% | -50.9% |
| 6M | -42.6% | -6.3% | -36.3% | -41.1% |
| YTD | -51.0% | +34.2% | -85.2% | -59.9% |
| 1Y | +43.3% | +39.9% | +3.4% | +13.6% |
| 3Y | -63.4% | +155.2% | -218.6% | -82.9% |
| All | -72.3% | +258.4% | -330.7% | -91.6% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside XPO.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus XPO return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × XPO return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over all: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded XPO wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
all analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling