-71.6%
FLNC vs SCCO
+307.9%
-379.5%
-90.4%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for all.
| Period | Portfolio | SCCO | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | +2.5% | -0.3% | +2.8% | +2.7% |
| 7D | -4.1% | -2.7% | -1.4% | -2.1% |
| 30D | -24.8% | -0.7% | -24.1% | -25.0% |
| 3M | -59.1% | +8.1% | -67.2% | -61.7% |
| 6M | -42.0% | +4.1% | -46.1% | -44.5% |
| YTD | -49.8% | +41.1% | -90.9% | -63.4% |
| 1Y | +43.1% | +95.6% | -52.5% | -16.7% |
| 3Y | -61.0% | +179.3% | -240.2% | -83.0% |
| All | -71.6% | +307.9% | -379.5% | -90.6% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside SCCO.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus SCCO return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × SCCO return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over all: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded SCCO wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
all analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling