-68.5%
FLNC vs LCID
-98.4%
+29.9%
-90.4%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for all.
| Period | Portfolio | LCID | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | +6.7% | -1.1% | +7.7% | +7.1% |
| 7D | +6.0% | +1.8% | +4.2% | +5.2% |
| 30D | -16.3% | -34.2% | +17.9% | -0.5% |
| 3M | -54.1% | -9.1% | -45.0% | -56.1% |
| 6M | -25.3% | -52.6% | +27.3% | -5.8% |
| YTD | -44.2% | -56.2% | +12.0% | -27.0% |
| 1Y | +53.1% | -74.9% | +128.0% | +157.8% |
| 3Y | -58.3% | -92.1% | +33.8% | -1.3% |
| All | -68.5% | -98.4% | +29.9% | +41.2% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside LCID.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus LCID return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × LCID return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over all: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded LCID wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
all analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling