-61.9%
FLNC vs GPC
-1.9%
-60.0%
-86.7%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 3y.
| Period | Portfolio | GPC | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | -4.2% | -0.8% | -3.5% | -4.0% |
| 7D | -5.0% | -1.8% | -3.2% | -4.6% |
| 30D | -26.1% | +0.1% | -26.2% | -26.2% |
| 3M | -55.2% | +37.4% | -92.5% | -60.3% |
| 6M | -42.6% | +25.4% | -68.0% | -47.6% |
| YTD | -51.0% | +12.2% | -63.2% | -53.4% |
| 1Y | +43.3% | -0.3% | +43.7% | +42.5% |
| All | -61.9% | -1.9% | -60.0% | -64.9% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside GPC.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus GPC return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × GPC return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 3y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded GPC wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
3y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling