-42.0%
FLNC vs EQH
+38.6%
-80.6%
-65.3%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 6mo.
| Period | Portfolio | EQH | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | +2.5% | +1.4% | +1.1% | +2.3% |
| 7D | -4.1% | +0.7% | -4.8% | -4.1% |
| 30D | -24.8% | +2.8% | -27.6% | -25.1% |
| 3M | -59.1% | +23.1% | -82.2% | -60.6% |
| 6M | -42.0% | +41.4% | -83.4% | -47.8% |
| All | -42.0% | +38.6% | -80.6% | -47.8% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside EQH.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus EQH return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × EQH return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 6mo: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded EQH wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
6mo analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling