+49.3%
FLNC vs EPAM
-30.2%
+79.5%
-68.6%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 1y.
| Period | Portfolio | EPAM | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | -8.3% | -0.5% | -7.8% | -8.3% |
| 7D | -4.2% | -2.2% | -2.0% | -4.0% |
| 30D | -20.0% | +17.8% | -37.8% | -21.0% |
| 3M | -56.9% | +19.9% | -76.8% | -56.4% |
| 6M | -35.5% | -21.6% | -13.9% | -28.3% |
| YTD | -48.8% | -44.0% | -4.8% | -39.6% |
| 1Y | +49.3% | -30.5% | +79.8% | +74.0% |
| All | +49.3% | -30.2% | +79.5% | +74.0% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside EPAM.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus EPAM return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × EPAM return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 1y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded EPAM wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
1y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling