-42.0%
FLNC vs DUOL
+50.3%
-92.3%
-65.3%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 6mo.
| Period | Portfolio | DUOL | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | +2.5% | -1.0% | +3.5% | +2.6% |
| 7D | -4.1% | -7.0% | +2.9% | -3.2% |
| 30D | -24.8% | +6.7% | -31.5% | -26.1% |
| 3M | -59.1% | +16.0% | -75.1% | -61.7% |
| 6M | -42.0% | +45.4% | -87.4% | -52.4% |
| All | -42.0% | +50.3% | -92.3% | -52.4% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside DUOL.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus DUOL return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × DUOL return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 6mo: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded DUOL wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
6mo analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling