-68.5%
FLNC vs DAR
-16.0%
-52.4%
-90.4%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for all.
| Period | Portfolio | DAR | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | +6.7% | +2.9% | +3.7% | +4.9% |
| 7D | +6.0% | -0.9% | +6.8% | +6.6% |
| 30D | -16.3% | +13.0% | -29.3% | -23.2% |
| 3M | -54.1% | +15.0% | -69.1% | -58.8% |
| 6M | -25.3% | +26.8% | -52.1% | -37.5% |
| YTD | -44.2% | +86.4% | -130.6% | -63.4% |
| 1Y | +53.1% | +115.1% | -62.0% | -8.6% |
| 3Y | -58.3% | +14.6% | -72.9% | -64.5% |
| All | -68.5% | -16.0% | -52.4% | -64.9% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside DAR.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus DAR return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × DAR return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over all: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded DAR wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
all analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling