+88.1%
FLNC vs BIYA
-99.8%
+187.9%
-68.6%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for all.
| Period | Portfolio | BIYA | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | -8.3% | -0.4% | -7.9% | -8.3% |
| 7D | -4.2% | +2.7% | -6.9% | -4.2% |
| 30D | -20.0% | -16.7% | -3.3% | -19.8% |
| 3M | -56.9% | -74.6% | +17.8% | -57.2% |
| 6M | -35.5% | -85.4% | +49.8% | -36.8% |
| YTD | -48.8% | -94.2% | +45.3% | -47.1% |
| 1Y | +49.3% | -98.6% | +147.8% | +64.8% |
| All | +88.1% | -99.8% | +187.9% | +110.3% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside BIYA.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus BIYA return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × BIYA return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over all: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded BIYA wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
all analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling