-68.5%
FLNC vs ARWR
+31.9%
-100.4%
-90.4%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for all.
| Period | Portfolio | ARWR | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | +6.7% | -1.4% | +8.1% | +7.2% |
| 7D | +6.0% | +2.9% | +3.1% | +4.8% |
| 30D | -16.3% | -2.9% | -13.4% | -15.5% |
| 3M | -54.1% | +15.2% | -69.4% | -56.8% |
| 6M | -25.3% | +42.3% | -67.6% | -36.1% |
| YTD | -44.2% | +28.2% | -72.4% | -50.1% |
| 1Y | +53.1% | +213.2% | -160.1% | -2.4% |
| 3Y | -58.3% | +184.6% | -243.0% | -76.1% |
| All | -68.5% | +31.9% | -100.4% | -77.6% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside ARWR.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus ARWR return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × ARWR return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over all: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded ARWR wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
all analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling