-61.0%
FLNC vs ARMK
+127.5%
-188.5%
-86.7%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 3y.
| Period | Portfolio | ARMK | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | +2.5% | +3.2% | -0.7% | +1.3% |
| 7D | -4.1% | +3.1% | -7.2% | -5.1% |
| 30D | -24.8% | -2.8% | -22.0% | -24.0% |
| 3M | -59.1% | +7.6% | -66.7% | -60.1% |
| 6M | -42.0% | +47.9% | -89.9% | -49.7% |
| YTD | -49.8% | +60.0% | -109.8% | -58.3% |
| 1Y | +43.1% | +52.2% | -9.1% | +21.7% |
| 3Y | -61.0% | +131.4% | -192.4% | -76.5% |
| All | -61.0% | +127.5% | -188.5% | -76.5% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside ARMK.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus ARMK return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × ARMK return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 3y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded ARMK wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
3y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling