-79.9%
FLNC vs ACGL
+16.0%
-95.8%
-82.4%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 6mo.
| Period | Portfolio | ACGL | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | +3.5% | 0.0% | +3.4% | +3.5% |
| 7D | -16.2% | -1.4% | -14.8% | -18.0% |
| 30D | -28.1% | +12.4% | -40.5% | -9.7% |
| 3M | -61.3% | +11.1% | -72.4% | -52.3% |
| 6M | -79.9% | +16.3% | -96.2% | -70.1% |
| All | -79.9% | +16.0% | -95.8% | -70.1% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside ACGL.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus ACGL return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × ACGL return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 6mo: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded ACGL wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
6mo analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling