-68.4%
FLNC vs ACGL
+28.7%
-97.1%
-83.8%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 1y.
| Period | Portfolio | ACGL | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | +10.2% | +2.7% | +7.5% | +14.4% |
| 7D | -2.1% | +8.0% | -10.1% | +11.1% |
| 30D | -20.8% | +17.3% | -38.1% | +3.5% |
| 3M | -61.3% | +11.2% | -72.5% | -53.5% |
| 6M | -50.9% | +18.2% | -69.0% | -30.4% |
| YTD | -69.4% | +15.4% | -84.8% | -55.8% |
| 1Y | -68.4% | +26.5% | -94.9% | -53.4% |
| All | -68.4% | +28.7% | -97.1% | -53.4% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside ACGL.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus ACGL return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × ACGL return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 1y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded ACGL wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
1y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling