-34.5%
FLGT vs VOO
+75.9%
-110.4%
-55.3%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 3y.
| Period | Portfolio | VOO | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | +1.4% | -0.6% | +2.0% | +1.8% |
| 7D | +2.4% | -2.0% | +4.4% | +3.9% |
| 30D | +5.9% | -1.7% | +7.6% | +7.2% |
| 3M | +6.3% | +4.7% | +1.5% | +2.6% |
| 6M | +39.9% | +12.6% | +27.4% | +28.2% |
| YTD | -23.4% | +11.8% | -35.2% | -29.4% |
| 1Y | -7.6% | +17.5% | -25.2% | -17.8% |
| All | -34.5% | +75.9% | -110.4% | -61.1% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside VOO.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus VOO return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × VOO return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 3y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded VOO wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
3y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling