+129.0%
FITB vs ZCMD
-100.0%
+229.0%
-29.9%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 3y.
| Period | Portfolio | ZCMD | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | -0.6% | +4.0% | -4.6% | -0.6% |
| 7D | -0.4% | -4.1% | +3.7% | -0.4% |
| 30D | -5.1% | -22.7% | +17.6% | -5.1% |
| 3M | +3.5% | -62.5% | +66.0% | +3.2% |
| 6M | +17.2% | -99.5% | +116.7% | +20.2% |
| YTD | +17.6% | -99.7% | +117.4% | +21.3% |
| 1Y | +23.4% | -99.9% | +123.2% | +28.0% |
| All | +129.0% | -100.0% | +229.0% | +131.9% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside ZCMD.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus ZCMD return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × ZCMD return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 3y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded ZCMD wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
3y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling