+79.0%
FITB vs UMAC
+494.0%
-415.0%
-29.9%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for all.
| Period | Portfolio | UMAC | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | -0.2% | -3.1% | +2.9% | -0.1% |
| 7D | +0.6% | -0.9% | +1.5% | +0.6% |
| 30D | -4.7% | -7.7% | +2.9% | -4.7% |
| 3M | +6.7% | -26.4% | +33.1% | +6.9% |
| 6M | +12.6% | +61.9% | -49.3% | +10.7% |
| YTD | +19.1% | +86.5% | -67.4% | +16.5% |
| 1Y | +22.6% | +156.3% | -133.7% | +18.9% |
| All | +79.0% | +494.0% | -415.0% | +70.0% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside UMAC.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus UMAC return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × UMAC return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over all: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded UMAC wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
all analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling