+139.8%
FITB vs TLN
+583.6%
-443.8%
-29.9%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for all.
| Period | Portfolio | TLN | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | -0.2% | +3.8% | -3.9% | -0.5% |
| 7D | +0.6% | +7.1% | -6.5% | -0.1% |
| 30D | -4.7% | -3.9% | -0.8% | -4.5% |
| 3M | +6.7% | -16.2% | +22.8% | +7.9% |
| 6M | +12.6% | -5.8% | +18.4% | +12.1% |
| YTD | +19.1% | -15.4% | +34.5% | +19.6% |
| 1Y | +22.6% | -16.7% | +39.3% | +22.9% |
| 3Y | +127.1% | +473.8% | -346.6% | +62.8% |
| All | +139.8% | +583.6% | -443.8% | +74.2% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside TLN.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus TLN return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × TLN return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over all: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded TLN wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
all analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling