+141.1%
FITB vs PFGC
+82.7%
+58.5%
-29.9%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 3y.
| Period | Portfolio | PFGC | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | +0.4% | +0.2% | +0.2% | +0.3% |
| 7D | -0.6% | +1.5% | -2.1% | -1.1% |
| 30D | +7.0% | +17.4% | -10.4% | +0.5% |
| 3M | -4.8% | -2.4% | -2.4% | -4.1% |
| 6M | +13.5% | +18.2% | -4.7% | +5.4% |
| YTD | +19.1% | +23.7% | -4.6% | +6.4% |
| 1Y | +30.8% | +15.0% | +15.8% | +21.5% |
| All | +141.1% | +82.7% | +58.5% | +79.0% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside PFGC.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus PFGC return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × PFGC return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 3y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded PFGC wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
3y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling