+47.5%
FITB vs NIO
-93.2%
+140.7%
-51.7%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 5y.
| Period | Portfolio | NIO | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | +1.1% | -4.9% | +6.0% | +1.6% |
| 7D | +2.8% | -14.5% | +17.2% | +4.4% |
| 30D | +9.8% | -15.0% | +24.7% | +11.6% |
| 3M | -5.2% | -35.6% | +30.4% | -0.9% |
| 6M | +17.3% | -55.7% | +73.0% | +27.1% |
| YTD | +19.3% | -43.1% | +62.4% | +24.7% |
| 1Y | +32.7% | -53.5% | +86.2% | +41.8% |
| 3Y | +141.6% | -59.8% | +201.4% | +150.2% |
| All | +47.5% | -93.2% | +140.7% | +76.7% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside NIO.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus NIO return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × NIO return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 5y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded NIO wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
5y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling