+141.1%
FITB vs LSCC
+118.1%
+23.0%
-29.9%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 3y.
| Period | Portfolio | LSCC | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | +0.4% | +10.4% | -10.0% | -1.4% |
| 7D | -0.6% | +14.5% | -15.1% | -3.0% |
| 30D | +7.0% | -0.1% | +7.1% | +6.5% |
| 3M | -4.8% | -2.7% | -2.1% | -5.2% |
| 6M | +13.5% | -4.8% | +18.3% | +11.7% |
| YTD | +19.1% | +66.9% | -47.8% | +2.7% |
| 1Y | +30.8% | +85.8% | -55.1% | +10.0% |
| All | +141.1% | +118.1% | +23.0% | +70.0% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside LSCC.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus LSCC return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × LSCC return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 3y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded LSCC wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
3y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling