+127.0%
FITB vs GLDM
+128.8%
-1.8%
-29.9%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 3y.
| Period | Portfolio | GLDM | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | -0.2% | -0.9% | +0.7% | -0.2% |
| 7D | +0.6% | -0.5% | +1.1% | +0.6% |
| 30D | -4.7% | +4.4% | -9.1% | -4.8% |
| 3M | +6.7% | -1.1% | +7.7% | +6.8% |
| 6M | +12.6% | -13.7% | +26.2% | +12.7% |
| YTD | +19.1% | +2.8% | +16.4% | +18.9% |
| 1Y | +22.6% | +24.8% | -2.2% | +22.6% |
| All | +127.0% | +128.8% | -1.8% | +87.1% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside GLDM.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus GLDM return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × GLDM return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 3y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded GLDM wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
3y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling