+131.1%
FITB vs FROG
+202.6%
-71.5%
-29.9%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 3y.
| Period | Portfolio | FROG | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | -0.7% | -1.0% | +0.3% | -0.6% |
| 7D | +2.8% | -5.5% | +8.3% | +3.2% |
| 30D | -4.5% | -3.1% | -1.4% | -4.4% |
| 3M | +5.7% | +1.2% | +4.4% | +5.1% |
| 6M | +17.1% | +113.7% | -96.6% | +8.4% |
| YTD | +18.3% | +38.9% | -20.5% | +13.4% |
| 1Y | +23.9% | +72.0% | -48.1% | +15.0% |
| 3Y | +131.1% | +217.1% | -86.0% | +68.5% |
| All | +131.1% | +202.6% | -71.5% | +68.5% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside FROG.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus FROG return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × FROG return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 3y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded FROG wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
3y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling