+127.0%
FITB vs DECK
-3.0%
+130.0%
-29.9%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 3y.
| Period | Portfolio | DECK | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | -0.2% | +1.6% | -1.7% | -0.5% |
| 7D | +0.6% | -2.2% | +2.8% | +1.0% |
| 30D | -4.7% | -13.6% | +8.9% | -2.4% |
| 3M | +6.7% | -21.2% | +27.9% | +10.9% |
| 6M | +12.6% | -21.1% | +33.6% | +16.7% |
| YTD | +19.1% | -17.2% | +36.3% | +22.1% |
| 1Y | +22.6% | -30.7% | +53.4% | +28.9% |
| All | +127.0% | -3.0% | +130.0% | +144.4% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside DECK.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus DECK return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × DECK return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 3y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded DECK wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
3y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling