+126.0%
FITB vs ACGL
+31.5%
+94.5%
-29.9%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 3y.
| Period | Portfolio | ACGL | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | -0.8% | -3.0% | +2.2% | 0.0% |
| 7D | -1.5% | +0.9% | -2.4% | -1.7% |
| 30D | +5.8% | +13.7% | -7.9% | +2.6% |
| 3M | -6.1% | +8.0% | -14.2% | -7.9% |
| 6M | +5.9% | +13.3% | -7.3% | +2.5% |
| YTD | +16.1% | +11.8% | +4.3% | +12.6% |
| 1Y | +28.8% | +22.2% | +6.6% | +22.3% |
| 3Y | +126.0% | +32.5% | +93.5% | +138.5% |
| All | +126.0% | +31.5% | +94.5% | +138.5% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside ACGL.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus ACGL return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × ACGL return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 3y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded ACGL wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
3y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling