-62.0%
FISV vs UMAC
+129.0%
-191.0%
-65.2%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 1y.
| Period | Portfolio | UMAC | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | +5.4% | -2.5% | +7.9% | +5.3% |
| 7D | -2.7% | -3.4% | +0.7% | -2.7% |
| 30D | 0.0% | -15.1% | +15.1% | -0.2% |
| 3M | -2.8% | -10.8% | +8.0% | -2.2% |
| 6M | -11.8% | +15.7% | -27.5% | -10.6% |
| YTD | -23.2% | +80.1% | -103.4% | -19.6% |
| 1Y | -62.0% | +116.7% | -178.7% | -60.7% |
| All | -62.0% | +129.0% | -191.0% | -60.7% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside UMAC.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus UMAC return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × UMAC return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 1y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded UMAC wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
1y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling