-18.6%
FIG vs XLP
-2.5%
-16.2%
-44.8%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 6mo.
| Period | Portfolio | XLP | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | -4.4% | -0.8% | -3.6% | -4.0% |
| 7D | -16.3% | -1.0% | -15.3% | -15.9% |
| 30D | -14.3% | -0.9% | -13.4% | -14.2% |
| 3M | +7.2% | +3.8% | +3.3% | +9.4% |
| 6M | -18.6% | -1.7% | -16.9% | -13.8% |
| All | -18.6% | -2.5% | -16.2% | -13.8% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside XLP.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus XLP return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × XLP return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 6mo: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded XLP wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
6mo analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling