-79.1%
FIG vs STLA
-37.7%
-41.4%
-86.2%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for all.
| Period | Portfolio | STLA | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | -4.4% | +1.3% | -5.6% | -4.6% |
| 7D | -16.3% | +2.6% | -18.9% | -16.7% |
| 30D | -14.3% | -1.2% | -13.1% | -14.2% |
| 3M | +7.2% | -24.8% | +31.9% | +12.4% |
| 6M | -18.6% | -25.6% | +6.9% | -15.6% |
| YTD | -35.5% | -48.9% | +13.5% | -23.7% |
| 1Y | -55.8% | -38.8% | -17.0% | -56.1% |
| All | -79.1% | -37.7% | -41.4% | -79.5% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside STLA.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus STLA return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × STLA return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over all: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded STLA wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
all analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling