-83.6%
FIG vs PLTU
-32.0%
-51.6%
-86.2%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for all.
| Period | Portfolio | PLTU | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | +1.8% | +4.3% | -2.4% | +0.9% |
| 7D | -14.3% | -0.9% | -13.4% | -14.0% |
| 30D | -13.6% | -34.7% | +21.1% | -6.5% |
| 3M | -23.7% | -10.8% | -13.0% | -23.0% |
| 6M | -5.4% | +24.1% | -29.5% | -13.8% |
| YTD | -49.2% | -36.8% | -12.4% | -52.0% |
| 1Y | -57.4% | -47.0% | -10.4% | -59.8% |
| All | -83.6% | -32.0% | -51.6% | -83.7% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside PLTU.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus PLTU return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × PLTU return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over all: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded PLTU wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
all analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling