-79.9%
FIG vs NBIX
+13.9%
-93.9%
-86.2%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for all.
| Period | Portfolio | NBIX | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | +4.8% | -0.2% | +5.0% | +4.8% |
| 7D | -3.8% | +0.4% | -4.2% | -3.9% |
| 30D | -2.3% | -0.2% | -2.1% | -2.4% |
| 3M | +20.0% | -4.0% | +23.9% | +19.9% |
| 6M | -16.7% | +20.6% | -37.3% | -20.8% |
| YTD | -37.9% | +10.1% | -48.1% | -40.0% |
| 1Y | -58.5% | +8.8% | -67.3% | -60.9% |
| All | -79.9% | +13.9% | -93.9% | -84.9% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside NBIX.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus NBIX return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × NBIX return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over all: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded NBIX wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
all analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling