-84.0%
FIG vs MLM
-5.7%
-78.3%
-86.2%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for all.
| Period | Portfolio | MLM | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | -16.7% | -5.2% | -11.5% | -16.3% |
| 7D | -17.4% | -1.2% | -16.2% | -16.9% |
| 30D | -15.9% | +7.9% | -23.9% | -15.3% |
| 3M | -34.5% | -4.5% | -30.0% | -34.5% |
| 6M | -5.0% | -12.6% | +7.6% | -6.8% |
| YTD | -50.7% | -14.9% | -35.8% | -50.7% |
| 1Y | -58.1% | -13.1% | -45.0% | -57.9% |
| All | -84.0% | -5.7% | -78.3% | -79.1% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside MLM.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus MLM return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × MLM return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over all: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded MLM wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
all analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling